“For any of the stroke symptoms, major, minor, or transitory, time remains of the essence,” said Dr. Current campaigns would really only need to add that message at the end of the TV advertisement or poster – ‘and don’t ignore symptoms that might be a small ‘warning stroke’ either - that is an emergency, too.”Also, he said, “The most important immediate thing that you can do yourself if you have a ‘TIA’ is to take an aspirin (same as is advised after a suspected heart attack).“It was almost as though the messages from the campaign about major stroke had falsely reassured them that the more minor event that they had experienced was probably nothing to worry about,” said Rothwell, senior author of a study on the campaign´s impact.

“If you have a minor ‘warning’ event, the risk of a more major stroke over the next week is about 10 percent if you are not treated,” he said in an email. . “However, that risk is reduced by 80 percent if simple medical treatments are started urgently. Peter M.“Campaigns rightly stress the need to seek emergency medical attention if you have signs of a major stroke,” Rothwell said.The campaign warned, “When stroke strikes, act FAST.”Rothwell’s team looked at the impact of the Face, Arm, Speech, Time (FAST) public education campaign on the likelihood that patients would seek medical attention within three hours of their symptoms.  

“Although the campaign worked well for behavior after more major stroke, patients were still slow to act on, or ignored completely, the symptoms of minor events,” said Dr.Before the campaign, about 68 percent of people with major stroke obtained medical attention within three hours; after the FAST campaign this increased to 81 percent, according to the report in JAMA Neurology.Surprisingly, fewer patients correctly attributed their symptoms to TIA or minor stroke after the FAST campaign (28 percent) than before it (37 percent), and 5 percent of patients did not weft accumulator even report their symptoms until the next routine appointment with their doctor. Victor Loh from National University Health System, Singapore, who recently detailed the outpatient management of TIA, but was not involved in the study.. Rothwell from John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford. Take an aspirin and seek medical attention.”Facial weakness, arm symptoms and speech disturbance were less common among people with minor stroke or TIA than among those with major stroke, and only about 35 percent of patients with TIAs who didn’t seek medical attention had any of these signs.Minor strokes and “mini-strokes,” or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs), need early medical attention, just like major strokes, but a public education campaign in the UK had little success convincing the public to act fast after these events. Face: has it fallen on one side? Arms: can they raise them? Speech: is it slurred? Time: if you notice any of these signs, it’s time to call (for an ambulance).  

“The symptoms of TIA and minor stroke are very similar - but just less severe and more transient (often lasting only minutes).“Perhaps after the primary message of needing to head to hospital within the time window for patients with major stroke, the secondary message needs to be emphasized: that even if symptoms are mild or transitory, early review and intervention can drastically reduce the risk of a major stroke,” he said by email.In contrast, only about 40 percent of patients with TIA and minor stroke obtained medical attention within three hours both before and after the FAST campaign.

This is a far cry from the Narendra Modi government’s initial, confused, reaction.Welcome signs are now evident of the Centre changing its line on Kashmir in order to begin a conversation with all sections of society in the Valley so calm may be restored.It was at that meeting that the Centre’s changing stance first found articulation, and the home minister’s second visit to Srinagar seems to indicate the Modi government is now looking for ways to implement the decision to bring about a dialogue.  

The signs are good, but a dialogue takes time to fructify. In the past, the BSF has brought order back on the streets without alienating populations. Importantly, the general also said that to begin with, the protests after Hizbul Mujahideen commander Burhan Wani’s killing were spontaneous, and that Pakistan got into the act only afterwards. This was the very opposite of the Centre’s stand that Pakistan was responsible from the very beginning for the recent developments in the Valley.Two noteworthy developments took place before Mr Singh’s visit. But the point will become clear to ordinary Kashmiris SHJ-A Weft Feeder — the real constituency the government is trying to address. Union home minister Rajnath Singh arrived in Srinagar on Wednesday for the second time in a month in an effort to start a dialogue even with the Hurriyat.

This is a positive sign. Hooda, who commands the Army in the Valley, urging talks with all sections of society. Ordinary Kashmiris understand and appreciate this. Even at the all-party meeting in Delhi just before Independence Day, the Prime Minister’s outlook seemed one of pressing for a security-oriented solution.If Pakistan desires to push the envelope further in JK, no Hurriyat elements are likely to join the conversation with the Centre now for fear of facing reprisals at the hands of Pakistan-directed terrorist elements.

The second significant development was the public statement by Lt. This signalled that the policy was now moving towards de-escalation. He didn’t name the separatist outfit specifically, but said through tweets he was ready to converse with anyone within the parameters of “insaniyat, jambhooriat and Kashmiriyat”, the formula first articulated by Atal Behari Vajpayee over a decade ago. The home minister thus articulated the Vajpayee formulation from Srinagar. D. A few days earlier, at his meeting with an Opposition delegation from Kashmir led by former CM Omar Abdullah, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had spoken only of a dialogue within the framework of the Indian Constitution.S. The Centre, at least for now, has decided to withdraw the CRPF — which along with the JK police had used pellet guns indiscriminately against protesters, in the process blinding many civilians — from the Valley, and insert the BSF in its place.

An ILR application under the Tier 4 student visa category is normally turned down if an individual has been out of the UK for more than 540 days over the course of 10 years.  

Dr Islam has an impressive academic record: she was a Gates Scholar at the University of Cambridge, was awarded the best degree performance award at the London School of Economics, and received the Dr Zakir Hussain medal for academic excellence from Aligarh Muslim University,” said a spokesperson for Newnham College.Islam plans to appeal against the Home Office decision, which she believes flies in the face of the UK government’s “Global Britain” message.“Good luck building a ‘Global Britain’ when you can’t even support global universities,” she said.

Hundreds of academics, students and activists have signed an open letter to lobby the UK Home Office to reconsider its decision to deny a University of Cambridge scholar permanent residency in the UK for spending too much time in India, which she says was essential for fieldwork and research.Islam has been based in the UK for over a decade and was awarded a three-year Junior Research Fellowship after completing her PhD from Newnham College at the University of Cambridge this year..The response has caused widespread outrage in the academic community and a retaliatory open letter, doing the rounds on social media and now signed by over 900 academics and students, describes Islam as an “outstanding young academic with a promising career in the UK”.

“Dr Asiya Islam is a highly valued member of the research community at Newnham College and the University of Cambridge.“Her qualitative research on the ground in New Delhi is the key element of her PhD’s contribution to knowledge. But nope, apparently I failed to provide any exceptional reasons in support of your out of time application,” she said.Dr Asiya Islam’s application for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) was refused by the SHL-2W Loom Control System UK Home Office last week on the grounds that she had been out of Britain for longer than the stipulated period for such an application.“In addition, it is considered that you would be able to re-establish a private life and form new friendships, or resume friendships with former acquaintances, upon your return,” the letter adds.

In a letter weeks after Islam’s “super priority” ILR application costing nearly 3,500 pounds, the Home Office replied that it would not be “unreasonable” to expect her to “re-integrate back into life and society in India”, having only been in the UK for a “short period”.“I provided several letters to present the case that fieldwork is a crucial aspect of my work and should not count towards my days out of the country.The UK Home Office does not comment on individual cases but said that it considers each immigration application on its own merits, on a case-by-case basis. Her research is an asset to the UK and its academic community, yet her very success in academic fieldwork is now being held against her,” it notes.“Her case is distressing, but it also sends a foreboding signal that despite policy changes to protect Tier 2 researchers, UK universities will continue to lose the talented PhD researchers that they have invested years in training,” notes the open letter.  

It urges the Home Office to reconsider its stance and calls on Home Secretary Priti Patel for “appropriate discretion” in deciding her application.“Yes, that’s right – the Home Office refused my application because I was away doing academic work for a UK university.However, the 31-year-old academic points out that she had supplied supporting documents to explain the absence, which was due to time spent in New Delhi for her PhD on ‘Gender, Class, and Labour in the New Economy of Urban India’. The mind boggles,” said Islam, as she took to Twitter to express her shock.